In 1993, The Maryland Court of Special Appeals (CSA) held that the court could not divide social security benefits because they were not martial property under state law but rather governed by federal law. Therefore the CSA affirmed the trial court’s decision equally dividing the marital portion of husband’s pension when received but not dividing the wife’s social security benefit. The court made no other adjustment to the equitable distribution of marital property for social security. Pleasant v Pleasant, 97 Md. App. 711, 632 A.2d 202 (1993).